To What Extent Can Language Shape Our Beliefs?

TO WHAT EXTENT bed LANGUAGE SHAPE OUR BELIEFS? Language is every last(predicate) around us. We use it for all kinds of things care saying our feelings, describing things, talking with our friends and family and typography literature. We may retrieve that we know what row really means, but rump we really be current near that? More importantly, to what extent brush aside language actually shape our beliefs? Well I study it depends on different people. With or so examples I will try to show that usage of language is to a greater extent complicated then many of us think. If we whole tone how scientists utter themselves. Most of them reckon in some kind of facts.They trust that everything on this major planet apprise be explained by facts, with words that we can note in different dictionaries. And this words argon not so hard to explain. So if I would be a scientist, I would probably joint, that the near important supposition of meaning is the commentary theory. I would say that, because I would believe that I can explain anything, lets say mathematics, with words that we prep are in dictionaries. And definition theory says that meanings are to be found in dictionary. So if we believe in something, that has a meaning in dictionary, can we know what we believe in?But if we look at artists, how can they express themselves? How can they express what they believe in? Definitely, they do not support definition theory. If an actor wants to express love, he cannot look in dictionary and find its definition. He mustiness capture some kind of get a line in his head for which he thinks, it is the best meaning of love. In that case, cons certain theory is the most appropriate one, because this theory says that meanings are found in our minds. He just makes an experience and he can tell everybody else, what they believe that love is.But, if we cannot find the exact meaning of word, can we believe in something that we just thought nigh ourselves? C an we believe in our image without thinking about ideas of other people? In my opinion, you cannot express yourself completely by definition theory or image theory. You must believe in twain of them. If you find a word in a dictionary, you lonesome(prenominal) know what it means and I think that is not enough. You can know its meaning, but sometimes you must make your avow image in your head. But in the other hand, if you find meanings mostly in your head, you can make mistakes and change the true meaning of the word.So mathematician shouldnt just rely on facts, he should also express his own ideas, eventide if they are not proved. And an artist should know that there are some meanings, that just cannot be changed and he must leave them as they are. I think that everybody in this world is more a scientist or more an artist. We must know that there are reliable facts that we must believe in like a scientist does, but there are also a lot of things, which we can give our own mean ing and believe in them. Language cant totally shape our beliefs, but it is up to us, if we stick to language as it is or if we look beyond it.To What Extent Can Language Shape Our Beliefs?TO WHAT EXTENT CAN LANGUAGE SHAPE OUR BELIEFS? Language is all around us. We use it for all kinds of things like expressing our feelings, describing things, talking with our friends and family and writing literature. We may think that we know what language really means, but can we really be sure about that? More importantly, to what extent can language actually shape our beliefs? Well I think it depends on different people. With some examples I will try to show that usage of language is more complicated then many of us think. If we look how scientists express themselves. Most of them believe in some kind of facts.They believe that everything on this planet can be explained by facts, with words that we can find in different dictionaries. And this words are not so hard to explain. So if I would be a scientist, I would probably say, that the most important theory of meaning is the definition theory. I would say that, because I would believe that I can explain anything, lets say mathematics, with words that we found in dictionaries. And definition theory says that meanings are to be found in dictionary. So if we believe in something, that has a meaning in dictionary, can we know what we believe in?But if we look at artists, how can they express themselves? How can they express what they believe in? Definitely, they do not support definition theory. If an actor wants to express love, he cannot look in dictionary and find its definition. He must make some kind of image in his head for which he thinks, it is the best meaning of love. In that case, image theory is the most appropriate one, because this theory says that meanings are found in our minds. He just makes an image and he can tell everybody else, what they believe that love is.But, if we cannot find the exact meaning of wor d, can we believe in something that we just thought about ourselves? Can we believe in our image without thinking about ideas of other people? In my opinion, you cannot express yourself completely by definition theory or image theory. You must believe in both of them. If you find a word in a dictionary, you only know what it means and I think that is not enough. You can know its meaning, but sometimes you must make your own image in your head. But in the other hand, if you find meanings mostly in your head, you can make mistakes and change the true meaning of the word.So mathematician shouldnt just rely on facts, he should also express his own ideas, even if they are not proved. And an artist should know that there are some meanings, that just cannot be changed and he must leave them as they are. I think that everybody in this world is more a scientist or more an artist. We must know that there are certain facts that we must believe in like a scientist does, but there are also a lot of things, which we can give our own meaning and believe in them. Language cant totally shape our beliefs, but it is up to us, if we stick to language as it is or if we look beyond it.